[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:02:14 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> I don't think we need such a thing. We just need to make it clear what
>> those empty tables mean and keep them out of the way. I.e. move them to
>> the end of the buffer and add a comment before them explaining that
>> these are currently empty.
> OK let's do this. I didn't insert a line explaining empty tables because
> they are obvious (See this screenshot: http://imgur.com/zCegB.png).
> (BTW, after looking at that screenshot I realised Makefile mode
> introduces 6 abbrev tables; amazing.)
> Let me know if you are OK with this patch.
The patch looks good, thank you, please install it. I'd still like to
see a comment added, but there are many other things that would be good
to add to edit-abbrevs (e.g. highlighting, or an actually useful C-h m
output explaining the format expected by C-c C-c, ...).
Stefan
- bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/27
- bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables, Leo, 2011/03/28
- bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/28
- bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables, Leo, 2011/03/28
- bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/28
- bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables, Leo, 2011/03/28
- bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/28
- bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables, Leo, 2011/03/29
- bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables, Leo, 2011/03/29