|
From: | Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: | bug#34749: 26.1; `delete-windows-on': (1) doc, (2) bug, (3) bug, (4) candidates |
Date: | Sat, 09 Mar 2019 20:12:02 +0200 |
> Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 09:35:24 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> > Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, 34749@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > I wonder if it would help to give an example where > > > we show correspondence between a spec that uses a > > > string argument to `interactive' that specifies a > > > few args to the function, of different types, and > > > a spec that uses a Lisp sexp, which when evaluated > > > produces a list of those same args. > > > > There's an example right after that text. > > I don't see an example that shows the correspondence > between a string arg and a Lisp sexp arg that returns > a list of args. Why is it important what types are the arguments? The issue was the significance of the newline in the interactive spec string, and that is independent of the types of the arguments.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |