bug#37420: [PATCH] Recommend against SHA-1 for security-related applications

[Stefan Kangas]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> > > (I also changed so the doc strings consistently say SHA-1 instead of
> > > SHA1, which seems to be more correct AFAICT.)
> >
> > Yup.
>
> Should we perhaps do something to help those who know this under the
> name "SHA1"?

Is there any risk that some users believe that these would be two
different algorithms?  My guess would be no, but I might be wrong.

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas