bug#37420: [PATCH] Recommend against SHA-1 for security-related applications

[Stefan Kangas]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> > > Should we perhaps do something to help those who know this under the
> > > name "SHA1"?
> >
> > Is there any risk that some users believe that these would be two
> > different algorithms?  My guess would be no, but I might be wrong.
>
> I have no idea, but I personally didn't even know SHA1 has another
> name, let alone a more "official" one.

This is the spelling in RFC 3174: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3174

Perhaps SHA1 is just a common typo?

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas