[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Feb 2020 22:21:36 +0200 |
> From: Mike FABIAN <mfabian@redhat.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, 39799@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 18:30:12 +0100
>
> U+24C2 is an Emoji which has both a text and an emoji presentation.
I don't think I understand how this fact is relevant to which font
Emacs selects for a character. Can you elaborate on the relation?
> If I test in gedit, U+24C2 on its own is displayed in black and white
> (happens to use "MS Gothic" font on my system).
> U+24C2 U+FE0E is displayed in black and white in gedit as well.
> U+24C2 U+FE0F is displayed in colour in gedit using the "Noto Color
> Emoji" font.
>
> These selectors don’t work in Emacs for me. U+24C2, U+24C2 U+FE0E, and
> U+24C2 U+FE0F *all* display in black and white for me in Emacs.
>
> The selectors are displayed as a narrow box.
Emacs doesn't yet support display of sequences with variation
selectors, although at least some part of the infrastructure is
already there, see ftfont_variation_glyphs and similar functions in
other HarfBuzz-based font backends.
> The presence of such selectors in a currently visible buffer make my
> Emacs extremely slow and unresponsive, I can hardly finish typing this
> e-mail.
Does it help to set inhibit-compacting-font-caches non-nil?
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, (continued)
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Robert Pluim, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Robert Pluim, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Mike FABIAN, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Mike FABIAN, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Robert Pluim, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Mike FABIAN, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Mike FABIAN, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Mike FABIAN, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Robert Pluim, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Robert Pluim, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Mike FABIAN, 2020/02/29
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/29
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Mike FABIAN, 2020/02/29
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Mike FABIAN, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Mike FABIAN, 2020/02/29