[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Feb 2020 22:47:36 +0100 |
>>>>> On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 23:02:12 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> said:
>> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 22:25:44 +0200
>> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>> Cc: 39799@debbugs.gnu.org
>>
>> Hmm... it's possible I was confused, and the functions I mentioned are
>> unrelated to variation selectors. To see if that's so, try to
>> configure composition-function-table to display such sequences as
>> composed characters, and see what happens when you use a proper font
>> (e.g., the one with which Gedit displays the variations).
Eli> Looking into this some more reveals that we already have
Eli> composition-function-table set up for variation selectors, see the end
Eli> of lisp/language/japanese.el. Not sure why it's in japanese.el, but
Eli> the code doesn't seem to be specific to Japanese characters, unless
Eli> I'm missing something. So some debugging is required to understand
Eli> why we don't display sequences with variation selectors as intended.
Eli> Maybe DejaVu Sans doesn't support that? What if you try
Eli> emacs -Q -fn Noto Color Emoji"
Eli> does Emacs built with HarfBuzz then display the variation sequences as
Eli> expected?
-fn "Noto Color Emoji" doesnʼt change the default font for me for some
reason, but if I change the font after startup then those sequences
display correctly.
(char-table-range composition-function-table #xFE0F)
=> ([".." 1 compose-gstring-for-variation-glyph])
and #xFE0F is always composable according to composite.c, so I donʼt
understand why composing only works with Noto Color Emoji. Or does the
font need specific support for it?
Robert
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, (continued)
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Mike FABIAN, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Mike FABIAN, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Robert Pluim, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Mike FABIAN, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Mike FABIAN, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Mike FABIAN, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Robert Pluim, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly,
Robert Pluim <=
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Mike FABIAN, 2020/02/29
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/29
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Mike FABIAN, 2020/02/29
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Mike FABIAN, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Mike FABIAN, 2020/02/29
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/29
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Mike FABIAN, 2020/02/29
- bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences don’t render correctly, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/29