[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for pe
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for performance |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Sep 2021 18:41:27 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>
> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:13:59 +0200
> Cc: 50599@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> We change, in my patch, 'checkdoc-max-keyref-before-warn' to a value
> like 1000 or 500 instead of nil. This would make me happy by not
> impacting any real use-cases [none of which will have 500+ commands in
> its docstring, or at least none of the ones that I care about will]
> and it would (hopefully) make you happy by sufficiently calling
> attention to any possible performance issues in some other cases.
I didn't realize that checkdoc is involved in this. If the problem is
that it produces annoying diagnostics for \\[..], then I'm okay with
removing it or making it less frequent.
I was only talking about the manual.
> With that, perhaps we could agree that it is okay to delete the
> paragraph in `(elisp) Documentation Tips'. Running 'checkdoc' is
> after all recommended in that section as well. WDYT?
My reluctance to delete that advice is unrelated to checkdoc or what
it does. I don't want to remove that advice completely, as I already
said and explained. But I'm okay with making the text be a more
general advice as opposed to some rigid rule.
- bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for performance, Stefan Kangas, 2021/09/15
- bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for performance, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/09/15
- bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for performance, Stefan Kangas, 2021/09/15
- bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for performance, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/09/15
- bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for performance, Stefan Kangas, 2021/09/15
- bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for performance,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for performance, Stefan Kangas, 2021/09/15
- bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for performance, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/09/15
- bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for performance, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/09/16
- bug#50599: [External] : bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for performance, Drew Adams, 2021/09/15