[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for pe
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for performance |
|
Date: |
Wed, 15 Sep 2021 22:03:42 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>
> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 20:37:36 +0200
> Cc: 50599@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > I didn't realize that checkdoc is involved in this. If the problem is
> > that it produces annoying diagnostics for \\[..], then I'm okay with
> > removing it or making it less frequent.
>
> Thanks, I've pushed a patch to that effect.
Thanks, I installed a followup that rewords the manual text.
- bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for performance, Stefan Kangas, 2021/09/15
- bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for performance, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/09/15
- bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for performance, Stefan Kangas, 2021/09/15
- bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for performance, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/09/15
- bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for performance, Stefan Kangas, 2021/09/15
- bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for performance, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/09/15
- bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for performance, Stefan Kangas, 2021/09/15
- bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for performance,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for performance, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/09/16
- bug#50599: [External] : bug#50599: [PATCH] Don't recommend against "\[...]" substitutions for performance, Drew Adams, 2021/09/15