bug#54062: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Eshell should inform processes when a pipe is broken

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com> writes:

>> Thanks, this fixes the test.  However, I'm unsure we should fix this
>> inside eshell-sentinel: do we always want to ignore "broken pipe"
>> errors in Eshell subprocesses, and never show them to the user?
>
> I think we do want to ignore that error here. In `eshell-sentinel', we
> only run the `finish-io' code when the subprocess's state has already
> changed; in this case, that means the subprocess has already been
> terminated, since Eshell doesn't handle cases like SIGSTOP or SIGCONT
> yet (see the commented out functions at the bottom of
> lisp/eshell/esh-proc.el). Normally, if we detect a broken pipe, we'd
> want to signal the subprocess that tried to write, but since we know
> it's already been terminated, there's no (living) process to signal
> anymore.

Makes sense to me, I think, so I pushed the patch to Emacs 29.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no