bug#14816: 24.3.50.1; ispell remember position, feature request

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> This changeset changes the form of the return value of
> ispell-process-line, so shouldn't that at least appear in
> incompatible changes in NEWS (if not done in some more compatible
> way)?

It seemed unlikely to me that third party packages would be using
ispell-process-line, so I didn't think either was necessary.  If it
turns out that it is, I was thinking of adding a new optional argument
to the function to alter the return value.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no