bug#14816: 24.3.50.1; ispell remember position, feature request

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de,  14816@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 13:46:55 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > This changeset changes the form of the return value of
> > ispell-process-line, so shouldn't that at least appear in
> > incompatible changes in NEWS (if not done in some more compatible
> > way)?
> 
> It seemed unlikely to me that third party packages would be using
> ispell-process-line, so I didn't think either was necessary.  If it
> turns out that it is, I was thinking of adding a new optional argument
> to the function to alter the return value.

Yes, I'm asking why not do that now, proactively?