[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?
From: |
Joern Thyssen |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h? |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 19:52:30 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 03:49:29PM -0400, Gary Wong wrote
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 07:41:27PM +0000, Joern Thyssen wrote:
> > However, I'm quite unsure whether libgen.h is standard or not?!
> >
> > Does anyone know?
>
> The GNU libc documentation (libc.info) mentions that the GNU basename
> function is prototyped in string.h, and that libgen.h is the XPG
> basename. So I presume that basename comes from X/Open, and
> unfortunately won't be standard outside Un*x systems.
OK, so it's probably better to remove <libgen.h>.
If basename from string.h is missing on, say, windows we can write a
replacement function.
Jørn
--
Joern Thyssen, PhD
Vendsysselgade 3, 3., DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
+45 9813 2791 (private) / +45 2077 2689 (mobile) / +45 9633 7036 (work)
- [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joern Thyssen, 2002/08/06
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Gary Wong, 2002/08/06
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?,
Joern Thyssen <=
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Jim Segrave, 2002/08/06
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Øystein Johansen, 2002/08/07
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joern Thyssen, 2002/08/07
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joseph Heled, 2002/08/09
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joern Thyssen, 2002/08/10
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joseph Heled, 2002/08/10
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joern Thyssen, 2002/08/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joseph Heled, 2002/08/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joern Thyssen, 2002/08/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joseph Heled, 2002/08/11