[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Bug-gnubg] 0.13.x branched in CVS
From: |
Ian Shaw |
Subject: |
RE: [Bug-gnubg] 0.13.x branched in CVS |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jan 2003 08:57:00 -0000 |
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 07:42:15PM +0100, Nardy Pillards wrote:
> > From: "Gary Wong" <address@hidden>
> > > Since opinion generally seems to be in favour of CVS
> branches for more
> > > frequent stable(ish) pre-releases, let's give it a try for 0.13.
> >
> > So, for Win32 builds:
> >
> > only publish builds from branch-0-13 ?
>
> I think whoever is doing the builds should decide.
>
> I expect that builds from branch-0-13 (or whatever the most recent is)
> would be sufficient for most users, but if the builder of the binaries
> wants the latest features, then there's no reason not to make builds
> from the trunk as well (or instead).
>
I'm one of those who likes the latest features to play with, so my
preference would be for the trunk. I think there is probably also a
demand for a stable verison, for those who don't check the cahnge log
every day.
--Ian
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] 0.13.x branched in CVS, (continued)
RE: [Bug-gnubg] 0.13.x branched in CVS,
Ian Shaw <=