[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Snowie 4 vs. GNU 0.13
From: |
Joern Thyssen |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Snowie 4 vs. GNU 0.13 |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Jun 2003 15:15:49 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:11:15PM +0100, Ian Shaw wrote
> Perhaps the numbers are right and it's out interprettion that's wrong.
>
> The numbers say that the average reault is 0.56 in favour of GnuBg,
> +-0.98 95%CI, assuming a normal distribution. It's certainly true that
> the results fitted in the range 1.54 to -0.42, but the distribution
> wasn't a normal one.
>
> I think Rod is perhaps right, and we need stats from several series of
> matches.
>
> OTOH, maybe not. Check out these threads from rec.games.backgammon:
>
> http://www.bkgm.com/rgb/rgb.cgi?view+709
Aaah, it seems I'm missing a factor of sqrt(n) in my formulae.
It should be
0.56 +/- 0.98/sqrt(n)
instead.
That is,
0.56 +/- 0.1
The luck adjusted result is
0.500 +/- 0.014
Jørn
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Snowie 4 vs. GNU 0.13, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Snowie 4 vs. GNU 0.13, Joern Thyssen, 2003/06/09
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Snowie 4 vs. GNU 0.13, Albert Silver, 2003/06/09
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Snowie 4 vs. GNU 0.13, Albert Silver, 2003/06/09
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Snowie 4 vs. GNU 0.13, Joern Thyssen, 2003/06/09
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Snowie 4 vs. GNU 0.13, Albert Silver, 2003/06/09
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Snowie 4 vs. GNU 0.13, Joern Thyssen, 2003/06/09
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Snowie 4 vs. GNU 0.13, Joseph Heled, 2003/06/09
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Snowie 4 vs. GNU 0.13, Albert Silver, 2003/06/09
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Snowie 4 vs. GNU 0.13, Ian Shaw, 2003/06/09
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Snowie 4 vs. GNU 0.13, Ian Shaw, 2003/06/09
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Snowie 4 vs. GNU 0.13,
Joern Thyssen <=
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Snowie 4 vs. GNU 0.13, Ian Shaw, 2003/06/09
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Snowie 4 vs. GNU 0.13, Joseph Heled, 2003/06/10
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Snowie 4 vs. GNU 0.13, Albert Silver, 2003/06/15