Re: [Bug-gnubg] Feature request: Training tool "Randomize first N moves within 0.XXX equity."

[Michael Petch]

Another variation on a theme one might be to not double on an “Optional cube” and wait until it becomes an actual Double

On 08/10/09 8:46 AM, "address@hidden" <address@hidden> wrote:

You could have "aggressive personality" !
Defined as maybe if moves are within x equity chose the best one that hits a checker.
Also for cube decisions if volatility >X then double earlier within X equity.

Lots of possibilities but I'd be happy just being able to randomize the openings and replies.
That alone would would lead to many different games for practicing.


Michael



> From: address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 15:59:06 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Feature request: Training tool "Randomize first N moves within 0.XXX equity."
> To: address@hidden
> CC: address@hidden; address@hidden
>
> The "personalities" thing would be very interesting IMO:
>
> - a small set of predefined personalities (eventually, ability to
> define custom ones, on chequer play and cube decision)
>
> - possibility to chose a given personality or to pick a random
> one (not disclosed, unless requested).
>
> MaX.
>
> 2009/10/8 Jonathan Kinsey <address@hidden>:
> > This reminds me of the discussion on "personalities", as the kind of
> > approach
> > you suggest could easily fit into the post-evaluation equity adjustments
> > that
> > are an easy way to add varied gnu-opponents.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > Michael Depreli wrote:
> >> I'm sure many users use gnubg simply to play against as self training.
> >> One issue that for me doesn't help with training is that gnubg will
> >> obviously always play the same opening move or reply etc in the same
> >> given position.
> >> In real life backgammon obviously this isn't the case.
> >> As a simple example for money gnubg plays 52 13/8 13/11.
> >> Rollouts show this to be an error, and I'm guessing most humans would
> >> not play this move the majority of the time.
> >> Also rollouts have shown many opening plays and replies are very close
> >> in equity so as not be be considered an error.
> >>
> >> My request therefore is to have an option to randomize the first N moves
> >> within equity X.
> >>
> >> I would suggest something like a move filter:
> >>
> >> E.g. Randomize first N moves within X plus additional N moves within Y.
> >>
> >> Hopefully I'm not the only user that would find this feature useful.
> >>
> >>
> >> Michael
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Have more than one Hotmail account? Link them together to easily access
> >> both.
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> >> address@hidden
> >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > New! Receive and respond to mail from other email accounts from within
> > Hotmail Find out how.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bug-gnubg mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
> >
> >
       

---

New! Receive and respond to mail from other email accounts from within Hotmail Find out how. <http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/167688463/direct/01/>

---

_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg