bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: [Bug-gnubg] cube decision analysis in 'limited' cash games...


From: 保坂範行
Subject: Fwd: [Bug-gnubg] cube decision analysis in 'limited' cash games...
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:03:58 +0900

Nori




---------- 転送メッセージ ----------
From: Julian Wilson <address@hidden>
日付: 2010年6月27日23:58
件名: Re: [Bug-gnubg] cube decision analysis in 'limited' cash games...
To: 保坂範行 <address@hidden>


thank you for your comments...

I think the key questions that need to be answered from GNU are:

1.      what is the value of the redouble?
2.      what is the value of a double or treble?
then - deduct from take point equity in a 'limited' cash play game



On 27 Jun 2010, at 12:33, 保坂範行 wrote:

> Hi.
>
> If it is 4pt limited $ session, it is very bad idea to "emulate " it
> with 4away-4away match.
> Especially "redouble to 4"
> In match game we know, we need 40% to take.
> In limetd money game, we need only 25%
>
> So, redouble to 8 in 8pt limited money session must be ill evaluated
> in 8pt match.
>
> Nori
>
>
>
> 2010/6/27 Jonathan Kinsey <address@hidden>:
>> There isn't an option to set limits in cash games in gnubg. I suppose
>> setting
>> it up as the first game in a 8 point match (in your example) would give a
>> closer
>> analysis, I imagine there are some subtle differences though.
>>
>> Jon
>>
>> On 27/06/2010 08:04, Julian Wilson wrote:
>>> hello all.
>>>
>>> when playing money games online the players usually 'limit' their losses
>>> by setting a stake per point but with a maximum loss (e.g. £10 per point £80
>>> maximum loss). Assuming these parameters and the cube is at 4 or 8, then I'm
>>> concerned that the cube decision analysis is wrong. My concern is that as
>>> the game is limited and the cube (say) at 8 (in the example given) then no
>>> player can win a double or treble game and more importantly the redouble
>>> option is also of no value.
>>>
>>> Is this a real limitation of the cube decision analysis? And if yes then
>>> are there any settings options (in GNU) to accurately model cube decisions
>>> in limited loss cash games?
>>>
>>> Thanks in anticipation.
>>>
>>> Julian
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bug-gnubg mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Get a free e-mail account with Hotmail. Sign-up now.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bug-gnubg mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]