Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark

[Joseph Heled]

Here are all the possibilities for a 3,1 from the initial position. I
am worried that 8-5 6-5 sneaks at number 6

  score               gnubg id                       position
8.00384996831 4HPwATDgc/ABIQ (0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5,
-5, 0, 0, 0, 3, 0, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0)
7.83777993917 4HPwATDEc/ABKA (0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5,
-5, 0, 0, 0, 3, 0, 4, 0, 0, 1, 0, -2, 0)
7.81063996255 4HPwATDgc/ABEg (0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5,
-5, 0, 0, 0, 3, 0, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0)
7.75730997324 4HPwATDgc+IBKA (0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 4,
-5, 0, 1, 0, 3, 0, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0)
7.43968993425 4HPwATDQZ/ABKA (0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5,
-5, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 5, 1, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0)
6.84054994583 4HPwATCwZ/ABMA (0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5,
-5, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 4, 2, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0)
6.81688992679 4HPwATDga/ABIg (0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5,
-5, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0)
6.67967991531 4HPwATDQc/ABIg (0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5,
-5, 0, 0, 0, 3, 0, 4, 1, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0)
6.67962995172 4HPwATDCc/ABMA (0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5,
-5, 0, 0, 0, 3, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 1, -2, 0)
6.24834996462 4HPwATDIZ/ABMA (0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5,
-5, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 5, 0, 1, 0, 0, -2, 0)
6.10885995626 4HPwATDgc+EBMA (0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 4,
-5, 0, 0, 1, 3, 0, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0)
4.3719098568  4HPwATDEa/ABMA (0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5,
-5, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 4, 0, 0, 1, 0, -2, 0)
4.29143989086 4HPwATDga+IBMA (0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 4,
-5, 0, 1, 0, 2, 1, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0)
4.23469984531 4HPwATCkc/ABMA (0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5,
-5, 0, 0, 0, 3, 0, 3, 1, 0, 1, 0, -2, 0)
4.15422987938 4HPwATDQc+IBMA (0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 4,
-5, 0, 1, 0, 3, 0, 4, 1, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0)
3.22565984726 4HPwATDQV/ABMA (0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, -5, 0, -3, 0, 0, 0, 5,
-5, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 5, 1, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0)


On 20 January 2012 03:45, Mark Higgins <address@hidden> wrote:
> :) I'll give it a try and check the couple games you sent.
>
>
> On Jan 19, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Joseph Heled wrote:
>
>> I was asking for help, not for more work.
>>
>> For example, anyone who implemented play against pubeval can check a
>> few of the moves I sent.
>>
>> -Joseph
>>
>> On 20 January 2012 03:35, Mark Higgins <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> I used the following post to define pubeval; is this the proper definition 
>>> still:
>>>
>>> http://www.bkgm.com/rgb/rgb.cgi?view+610
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 19, 2012, at 8:31 AM, Joseph Heled wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I just run 10000 1 point match games between gnubg and pubeval. I
>>>> think this is the most fair, since there are no gammons of cubes
>>>> involved.
>>>>
>>>> However, gnubg won 9840 of those, which makes me think something is wrong.
>>>>
>>>> Can someone help me verify that pubeval makes the "right" moves?
>>>>
>>>> I can send a few games in oldmoves format, or can check specific moves.
>>>>
>>>> I am attaching 2 games as examples.
>>>>
>>>> -Joseph
>>>> <game1.fibs><game2.fibs>
>>>
>