Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark

[Massimiliano Maini]

Hi Joseph,

happy to see you work again on all this :)

Very interesting question you've raised here.

XG developer (Xavier Dufaure de Citres) is active on BGonline.com
(http://www.bgonline.org/forums/): if you ask your question (gnubg 0ply
vs XG 1ply) there, he may be willing to help.

MaX.

On 20 January 2012 00:18, Joseph Heled <address@hidden> wrote:
> Speaking of bot to bot comparisons...
>
> Anyone knows anything about the "raw" strength of the XG variants? By
> raw I mean a the 0-ply equivalent, i.e. without any lookup.
>
> I guess what I am asking is: how much of  XG strength comes from
> quality of implementation, and how much from the basic net evaluation?
>
> -Joseph