[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert |
Date: |
Thu, 05 May 2011 13:43:40 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110421 Fedora/3.1.9-2.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.9 |
On 05/05/11 10:24, Eric Blake wrote:
>> +In C99, @code{assert} can be applied to any scalar expression.
>> > +In C89, the argument to @code{assert} is of type @code{int}.
> Is it worth trying to fix that in gnulib, as an independent fix? Are
> there any implementations where assert(0x100000000LL) fails instead of
> succeeds, because the conversion from long long back to int lost the
> non-zero bit?
A more interesting case is assert (P) where P is a pointer.
I've written code like that and never had a problem.
(But then, how would I know? :-)
Another case is assert (0.5). In C89 this must
report an assertion failure, but on all practical
implementations I know of, it succeeds. So to some extent
that C89 requirement never reflected reality, and the C99
change adjusted the standard to match reality better.
I wouldn't object to fixing 'assert' so that we're sure that
it has C99 semantics, but it's pretty low priority as the
problem, I expect, is only theoretical. Also, making the
fixed 'assert' report failures in the same way as the original
might prove to be a challenge.
- proposed support for C1X-style static_assert, Paul Eggert, 2011/05/05
- Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert, Bruno Haible, 2011/05/05
- Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert, Paul Eggert, 2011/05/05
- Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert, Bruno Haible, 2011/05/05
- Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert, Paul Eggert, 2011/05/05
- Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert, Paul Eggert, 2011/05/06
- Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert, Bruno Haible, 2011/05/22
- Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert, Paul Eggert, 2011/05/22
- Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert, Bruno Haible, 2011/05/29
- Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert, Paul Eggert, 2011/05/29
- Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert, Bruno Haible, 2011/05/29
Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert, Andy Moreton, 2011/05/06