[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: musl, fdopen test
|
From: |
Bruno Haible |
|
Subject: |
Re: musl, fdopen test |
|
Date: |
Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:52 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/4.7.4 (Linux/3.1.10-1.9-desktop; KDE/4.7.4; x86_64; ; ) |
> > 2012-06-19 Bruno Haible <address@hidden>
> >
> > fdopen: Allow implementations that don't reject invalid fd arguments.
> > * m4/fdopen.m4 (gl_FUNC_FDOPEN): Let the test pass if fdopen(-1,...)
> > succeeds.
> > Reported by Rich Felker <address@hidden>.
>
> Thanks, Bruno.
> That patch looks perfect.
I have applied the patch.
Bruno
- Re: Why require SLOW_BUT_NO_HACKS for stubs?, (continued)
- Re: Why require SLOW_BUT_NO_HACKS for stubs?, Philipp Thomas, 2012/06/25
- Re: musl bugs found through gnulib, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/17
- Re: [musl] Re: musl bugs found through gnulib, idunham, 2012/06/17
- Re: [musl] Re: musl bugs found through gnulib, Rich Felker, 2012/06/18
- Re: [musl] Re: musl bugs found through gnulib, Eric Blake, 2012/06/18
- Re: [musl] Re: musl bugs found through gnulib, Rich Felker, 2012/06/18
- Re: musl, fdopen test, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/19
- Re: musl, fdopen test, Jim Meyering, 2012/06/19
- Re: musl, fdopen test,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: musl, printf out-of-memory test, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/19
- Re: [musl] Re: musl, printf out-of-memory test, Rich Felker, 2012/06/19
- Re: musl, printf out-of-memory test, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/19
- Re: musl, printf out-of-memory test, Rich Felker, 2012/06/19
- Re: musl, printf out-of-memory test, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/19
- Re: musl, printf out-of-memory test, Rich Felker, 2012/06/19
- Re: musl, printf out-of-memory test, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/20
- Re: musl, printf out-of-memory test, Jim Meyering, 2012/06/20
- Re: musl, printf out-of-memory test, Tom Tromey, 2012/06/21
- Re: [musl] Re: musl bugs found through gnulib, Rich Felker, 2012/06/19