[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/5] obstacks again
From: |
Joseph S. Myers |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/5] obstacks again |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:31:10 +0000 |
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Paul Eggert wrote:
> While we're in the neighborhood we should be using C11's alignof rather than
> reinventing that particular wheel; the second attached gnulib patch does that.
Note that we can't use <stdalign.h> in glibc sources unless we move to
requiring GCC >= 4.7 (and it's not clear whether we'd get consensus for
such a requirement if proposed).
--
Joseph S. Myers
address@hidden
- [PATCH 0/5] obstacks again, Alan Modra, 2014/10/28
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] obstacks again, Paul Eggert, 2014/10/29
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] obstacks again,
Joseph S. Myers <=
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] obstacks again, Alan Modra, 2014/10/29
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] obstacks again, Paul Eggert, 2014/10/29
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] obstacks again, Alan Modra, 2014/10/30
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] obstacks again, Paul Eggert, 2014/10/31
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] obstacks again, Eric Blake, 2014/10/31
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] obstacks again, Paul Eggert, 2014/10/31