[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: portability of fopen and 'e' (O_CLOEXEC) flag
|
From: |
Eric Blake |
|
Subject: |
Re: portability of fopen and 'e' (O_CLOEXEC) flag |
|
Date: |
Mon, 11 May 2020 12:41:12 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 |
On 5/11/20 11:37 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
POSIX [2][3], macOS [4], FreeBSD [5], Solaris [6] don't support this 'e' flag.
Although it _is_ slated to be added in a future revision of POSIX:
https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=411
How about using open() with O_CLOEXEC, and then fdopen()?
In the meantime, this is indeed more portable.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
- portability of fopen and 'e' (O_CLOEXEC) flag, Tim Rühsen, 2020/05/11
- Re: portability of fopen and 'e' (O_CLOEXEC) flag, Bruno Haible, 2020/05/11
- Re: portability of fopen and 'e' (O_CLOEXEC) flag,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: portability of fopen and 'e' (O_CLOEXEC) flag, Tim Rühsen, 2020/05/12
- Re: portability of fopen and 'e' (O_CLOEXEC) flag, Bruno Haible, 2020/05/24
- Re: portability of fopen and 'e' (O_CLOEXEC) flag, Daiki Ueno, 2020/05/26
- Re: portability of fopen and 'e' (O_CLOEXEC) flag, Bruno Haible, 2020/05/26
- Re: portability of fopen and 'e' (O_CLOEXEC) flag, Bruno Haible, 2020/05/26
- Re: portability of fopen and 'e' (O_CLOEXEC) flag, Bruno Haible, 2020/05/27
- Re: portability of fopen and 'e' (O_CLOEXEC) flag, Daiki Ueno, 2020/05/28
- Re: portability of fopen and 'e' (O_CLOEXEC) flag, Daiki Ueno, 2020/05/28
- Re: portability of fopen and 'e' (O_CLOEXEC) flag, Bruno Haible, 2020/05/28
- Re: portability of fopen and 'e' (O_CLOEXEC) flag, Daiki Ueno, 2020/05/28