[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch
From: |
Chris B . Vetter |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jun 2002 10:01:49 -0700 |
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 16:24:25 +0100 (BST)
Nicola Pero <nicola@brainstorm.co.uk> wrote:
[...]
> It's a bit sad, but maybe this is the best solution in practice - I
> received a couple of private emails with precisely this suggestion - that
> on Solaris trying to use /bin/sh is going to cause headaches forever and
> that everyone using Solaris is actually using a POSIX shell instead (such
> as zsh - which if I understood currectly is shipped with solaris too -, or
> bash).
Both, actually, if not quite up-to-date... (haven't tested Sol9 yet)
:0> uname -sr
SunOS 5.8
:0> ls -olaF /bin/*sh
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root 516392 Jan 5 2000 /bin/bash*
-r-xr-xr-x 2 root 159212 Apr 18 2001 /bin/csh*
-r-xr-xr-x 4 root 95316 Apr 3 2001 /bin/jsh*
-r-xr-xr-x 3 root 200940 May 31 2001 /bin/ksh*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root 5 Jun 24 2001 /bin/remsh -> ./rsh*
-r-xr-xr-x 3 root 200940 May 31 2001 /bin/rksh*
-r-sr-xr-x 1 root 8964 Jan 5 2000 /bin/rsh*
-r-xr-xr-x 4 root 95316 Apr 3 2001 /bin/sh*
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root 331332 Mar 15 2001 /bin/tcsh*
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root 472788 Jan 5 2000 /bin/zsh*
> Objections anyone ? Is such an approach going to make someone unhappy ?
Certainly not me.
--
Chris
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch, Nicola Pero, 2002/06/22
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch, Adam Fedor, 2002/06/24
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/06/25
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch, Nicola Pero, 2002/06/25
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch, Markus Hitter, 2002/06/25
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch, Nicola Pero, 2002/06/27
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch,
Chris B . Vetter <=
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch, Marcus Müller, 2002/06/27
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch, Chris B . Vetter, 2002/06/27
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch, Pascal Bourguignon, 2002/06/27