[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch
From: |
Chris B . Vetter |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jun 2002 11:06:41 -0700 |
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 19:25:28 +0200
Marcus Müller <znek@mulle-kybernetik.com> wrote:
> > Both, actually, if not quite up-to-date... (haven't tested Sol9 yet)
> Same here (Sol 8).
That's what I'm using ;-)
> >> Objections anyone ? Is such an approach going to make someone unhappy ?
> > Certainly not me.
> Nope. But what exactly would you replace #!/bin/sh in the GNUstep
> scripts with? A current FreeBSD still ships with:
No need, if you use zsh. Using 'emulate csh' you could use zsh to, well,
emulate csh behaviour (see 'man zshall').
I don't think it's possible to write one script that can be interpreted
by every shell variant, but since /bin/sh exist on every system... The
problem would be to find a common denominator, since some systems link
/bin/sh to /bin/bash, others to /bin/csh or /bin/ksh.
Come to think of, osh(1) probably is the 'purest' shell, implementing
just the standard commands of UNIX up to edition 7.
See
http://omnibus.ruf.uni-freiburg.de/~gritter/man/osh.html
--
Chris
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch, (continued)
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch, Adam Fedor, 2002/06/24
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/06/25
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch, Nicola Pero, 2002/06/25
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch, Markus Hitter, 2002/06/25
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch, Nicola Pero, 2002/06/27
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch, Chris B . Vetter, 2002/06/27
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch, Marcus Müller, 2002/06/27
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch,
Chris B . Vetter <=
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch, Pascal Bourguignon, 2002/06/27