[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO
From: |
nobody |
Subject: |
[bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Jul 2003 18:40:07 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030401 Debian/1.0.2-2 |
=================== BUG #4189: FULL BUG SNAPSHOT ===================
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=4189&group_id=99
Submitted by: stefanu Project: GNUstep
Submitted on: Fri 07/04/03 at 00:40
Category: Base/Foundation Severity: 7
Bug Group: Bug Resolution: None
Assigned to: None Status: Open
Summary: broken bycopy in DO
Original Submission: if i have a method with bycopy return value on server
side, i am getting remote objects on clients side insetad of copies. i have to
explicitly cast on client side to some protocol with same method defined as
bycopy to make it work. sometimes it is not possible to cast. The server side
should be responsible and decides what objects are passed by copy or by
reference.
This bug is related to one former - DO is using selector information from local
runtime instead of distant runtime. this is wrong and makes it difficult to
develop and debug DO applications.
No Followups Have Been Posted
CC list is empty
No files currently attached
For detailed info, follow this link:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=4189&group_id=99
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO,
nobody <=
- [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, nobody, 2003/07/04
- Re: [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, Alexander Malmberg, 2003/07/04
- Re: [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/07/04
- Re: [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/07/04
- Re: [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, Alexander Malmberg, 2003/07/04
- Re: [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/07/04
- Re: [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/07/04
- Re: [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, Alexander Malmberg, 2003/07/04
- Re: [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/07/04
- Re: [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, Nicola Pero, 2003/07/04