[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO
From: |
Alexander Malmberg |
Subject: |
Re: [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO |
Date: |
Fri, 04 Jul 2003 14:42:33 +0200 |
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
[snip]
> I have a machine with gcc-3.0 ... I'll have a look at it on that to try
> to
> figure out what's going on.
In 3.0.4, gcc/libobjc/Protocol.m, line 109, class_methods may be NULL.
Can be worked around with a Protocol category with a fixed
implementation (although later gcc versions seem to have fixed it by
guaranteeing that class_methods will never be NULL).
However, there also seem to be serious problems in the handling of
@protocol(), and I'm not sure that can be worked around. Nicola fixed
those problems in gcc, so he can probably tell you more.
- Alexander Malmberg
- [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, nobody, 2003/07/03
- [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, nobody, 2003/07/04
- Re: [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, Alexander Malmberg, 2003/07/04
- Re: [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/07/04
- Re: [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/07/04
- Re: [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO,
Alexander Malmberg <=
- Re: [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/07/04
- Re: [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/07/04
- Re: [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, Alexander Malmberg, 2003/07/04
- Re: [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/07/04
- Re: [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, Nicola Pero, 2003/07/04
- Re: [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/07/04
- Re: [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/07/04
- Re: [bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, Alexander Malmberg, 2003/07/04
[bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, nobody, 2003/07/04
[bug #4189] broken bycopy in DO, nobody, 2003/07/04