bug-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bugs #8267] gnustep-base-1.9.1 doesn't compile on MinGW using libffi


From: Willem Rein Oudshoorn
Subject: [bugs #8267] gnustep-base-1.9.1 doesn't compile on MinGW using libffi
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:37:19 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/124 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125

This mail is an automated notification from the bugs tracker
 of the project: GNUstep.

/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #8267] Latest Modifications:

Changes by: 
                Willem Rein Oudshoorn <woudshoo@xs4all.nl>
'Date: 
                Tue 03/23/04 at 17:37 (Europe/Amsterdam)

            What     | Removed                   | Added
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Assigned to | None                      | wim


------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
I will look into it sometime this week.  But is there a reason
that you do not use ffcall ?

Wim Oudshoorn






/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #8267] Full Item Snapshot:

URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=8267>
Project: GNUstep
Submitted by: 0
On: Tue 03/23/04 at 16:04

Category:  Base/Foundation
Severity:  5 - Average
Item Group:  Bug
Resolution:  None
Assigned to:  wim
Status:  Open


Summary:  gnustep-base-1.9.1 doesn't compile on MinGW using libffi

Original Submission:  Because of a wrong link in ANNOUNCE, I already reported 
this bug in "Support" - Sorry!

gnustep-base-1.9.1 doesn't compile on MinGW using libffi because of a bug (?) 
in the MinGW header files. You can't:
#include ffi.h
#include windows.h

I already proposed a fix, but it's better to move
#include <ffi.h>
below the other two #include statements.

This fixes the bug in MinGW and should not hurt any other targets.

Follow-up Comments
------------------


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue 03/23/04 at 17:37         By: wim
I will look into it sometime this week.  But is there a reason
that you do not use ffcall ?

Wim Oudshoorn

-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue 03/23/04 at 16:06         By: None
Sorry, I obviously have troubles with savannah:
My email is ce AT hoyos DOT ws

Thank you, Carl Eugen Hoyos




CC List
-------

CC Address                          | Comment
------------------------------------+-----------------------------
ce --AT-- hoyos --DOT-- ws          | 









For detailed info, follow this link:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=8267>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]