Re: Removing libwraster

[Adam Fedor]

On May 24, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Alex Perez wrote:

> Adam,
>
> > Well, the stuff we still need is really basic - getting the correct
> > visual and colormap, etc. We could rewrite it, but then it would still
> > have to be maintained.  I've thought about it, but it doesn't really
> > seem worth my time.
>
> Dare I say it, but it seems that libwraster isn't exactly updated 
> often.
> Why don't we just take the tiny parts of the code that we need and 
> stick
> them in GNUstep itself? Are there copyright assignment issues here?
That's actually what we are talking about.  There is basic code from 
libwraster in GNUstep that is used if libwraster is not found.