[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bugs #10876] Starting of pasteboard server should be sooner
From: |
Richard Frith-Macdonald |
Subject: |
[bugs #10876] Starting of pasteboard server should be sooner |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Nov 2004 04:17:26 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/125.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.9 |
This mail is an automated notification from the bugs tracker
of the project: GNUstep.
/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #10876] Latest Modifications:
Changes by:
Richard Frith-Macdonald <rfm@gnu.org>
'Date:
Wed 11/03/2004 at 09:09 (GMT)
------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
Just an opinion but ...
I agree that the pasteboard should be started early (just like the other
daemons).
When I coded the automatic startup for these daemon, my intention was to
provide a final fallback solution to start them if they had either crashed/been
killed, or hand not been started earlier.
As such, I thought (and still think) that startup at the last possible moment
is correct.
So, I do not really think that starting them earlier within an application is
the right thing to do ... they should be started either at system boot time or
at user login (for user specific daemons). That being said, we might write a
tool to check daemons and start them if necessary. It would be easy to run
such a tool on login and/or run it in a subtask when an app start up.
/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #10876] Full Item Snapshot:
URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=10876>
Project: GNUstep
Submitted by: Stefan Urbanek
On: Tue 11/02/2004 at 22:37
Category: Gui/AppKit
Severity: 3 - Ordinary
Item Group: Change Request
Resolution: None
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: None
Status: Open
Summary: Starting of pasteboard server should be sooner
Original Submission: the pasteboard server (gpbs) should be started sooner,
not 'when requested'. Despite the lazy initialisation is a good practice,
running the pasteboard server is not the right place to use it. It is making
unpleasant user experience, when one tries to do cut/copy and more unpleasant
when one wants to do drag&drop operation for the first time.
Therefore I would suggest that gpbs, when not started automatically by some
init/login scripts, should be started by the first GNUstep application run,
before the application enters the main run loop. So the request for running the
gpbs will be 'first gnustep application run', not 'first use of pasteboard'.
Users are going to use PBS in most cases anyway.
Follow-up Comments
------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed 11/03/2004 at 09:09 By: Richard Frith-Macdonald <CaS>
Just an opinion but ...
I agree that the pasteboard should be started early (just like the other
daemons).
When I coded the automatic startup for these daemon, my intention was to
provide a final fallback solution to start them if they had either crashed/been
killed, or hand not been started earlier.
As such, I thought (and still think) that startup at the last possible moment
is correct.
So, I do not really think that starting them earlier within an application is
the right thing to do ... they should be started either at system boot time or
at user login (for user specific daemons). That being said, we might write a
tool to check daemons and start them if necessary. It would be easy to run
such a tool on login and/or run it in a subtask when an app start up.
For detailed info, follow this link:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=10876>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/