bug-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: darwin going upstream ?


From: Yves de Champlain
Subject: Re: darwin going upstream ?
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:36:09 -0500


Le 07-02-12 à 16:41, Adam Fedor a écrit :


On Feb 4, 2007, at 3:48 PM, Adam Fedor wrote:


On Jan 29, 2007, at 12:29 PM, Yves de Champlain wrote:

Hi

I would like to point out some patches needed to build gnustep on darwin / macosx so that they can go upstream and make the world a better place to live. If this list is not the right place, just let me know.

Note that these so-called patches are for darwin with the gnu runtime, so I don't think they can be applied as is, but I don't have mastered the gnustep make system that much.


Most of this looks reasonable. Do you know why latex.make does not work? Is there a particular command we can focus on, or is there an error message that shows what's going on?


Also, why are you using SHARED_LD_POSTFLAGS in gnustep-back? That flag is only used when linking libraries AFAIK, so it shouldn't be doing anything. And also -lgnustep-gui should already be in the GNUmakefiles in the proper variables.

Totally useless indeed.  Probably the remains of an earlier version.

sorry about that.

BTW, what do these warnings mean ? Are tehy harmless ? Can they be avoided ?

...
'_OBJC_INSTANCE_14' defined but not used
'_OBJC_INSTANCE_15' defined but not used
'_OBJC_INSTANCE_16' defined but not used
'_OBJC_INSTANCE_17' defined but not used
...

thanks

yves






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]