Re: darwin going upstream ?

[Yves de Champlain]

Le 07-02-12 à 16:41, Adam Fedor a écrit :

> On Feb 4, 2007, at 3:48 PM, Adam Fedor wrote:
>
> > On Jan 29, 2007, at 12:29 PM, Yves de Champlain wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I would like to point out some patches needed to build gnustep on  
> > > darwin / macosx so that they can go upstream and make the world a  
> > > better place to live.  If this list is not the right place, just  
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Note that these so-called patches are for darwin with the gnu  
> > > runtime, so I don't think they can be applied as is, but I don't  
> > > have mastered the gnustep make system that much.
> >
> > Most of this looks reasonable.  Do you know why latex.make does  
> > not work? Is there a particular command we can focus on, or is  
> > there an error message that shows what's going on?
>
>
> Also, why are you using SHARED_LD_POSTFLAGS in gnustep-back?  That  
> flag is only used when linking libraries AFAIK, so it shouldn't be  
> doing anything. And also -lgnustep-gui should already be in the  
> GNUmakefiles in the proper variables.

Totally useless indeed.  Probably the remains of an earlier version.

sorry about that.

BTW, what do these warnings mean ? Are tehy harmless ?  Can they be  
avoided ?

...
'_OBJC_INSTANCE_14' defined but not used
'_OBJC_INSTANCE_15' defined but not used
'_OBJC_INSTANCE_16' defined but not used
'_OBJC_INSTANCE_17' defined but not used
...

thanks

yves