[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: darwin going upstream ?
From: |
Yves de Champlain |
Subject: |
Re: darwin going upstream ? |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Feb 2007 22:10:25 -0500 |
Le 07-02-04 à 17:48, Adam Fedor a écrit :
On Jan 29, 2007, at 12:29 PM, Yves de Champlain wrote:
Hi
I would like to point out some patches needed to build gnustep on
darwin / macosx so that they can go upstream and make the world a
better place to live. If this list is not the right place, just
let me know.
Note that these so-called patches are for darwin with the gnu
runtime, so I don't think they can be applied as is, but I don't
have mastered the gnustep make system that much.
Most of this looks reasonable. Do you know why latex.make does not
work? Is there a particular command we can focus on, or is there an
error message that shows what's going on?
Here is what is happening when building and including latex.make :
gnustep-make-docs-build.log
Description: Binary data
internals.log
Description: Binary data
The build stops because a weird error :
...
gzip internals.ps -c > internals.ps.gz
no internals
gnumake[1]: no: Command not found
gnumake[1]: *** [internals/internals.html] Error 127
gnumake: *** [internals.all.doc.variables] Error 2
Here is what happens when commenting out the include latex.make line :
gnustep-make-docs-install.log
Description: Binary data
pdf and text are installed, but not html (html is built ok, but not
installed)
thanks
yves
Re: darwin going upstream ?,
Yves de Champlain <=