bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#40528: 'guix lint' does not check whether propagated-inputs should b


From: Christopher Baines
Subject: bug#40528: 'guix lint' does not check whether propagated-inputs should be native
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 09:51:52 +0100
User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3

Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> writes:

> On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:42:18PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:24:25PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> >> 'guix lint -c inputs-should-be-native' only checks the 'inputs' field of
>> >> a package, not propagated-inputs.
>> >
>> > The attached patch should add the propagated inputs to the list of
>> > inputs to check. Do we want to start telling it to ignore some of them?
>>
>> Wow, that was incredibly fast!
>>
>> > gnu/packages/check.scm:2200:2: python-nose-timer@0.7.5: 'python-nose' 
>> > should probably be a native input
>>
>> I'm inclined to leave it.  I think many of these plugin packages should
>> not be propagating the package that they plug into anyway.
>>
>> LGTM!
>
> OK, patch pushed.

Looks like it's working :) [1]

1: 
http://data.guix.gnu.org/compare?base_commit=960abd585940c33744040c79e2a37e588d36e589&target_commit=d95252baf97adb261dd823d4e7a74a7522815c1c

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]