bug#45826: SBCL / Common Lisp packages fail to build on aarch64

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi,

Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:

> On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 02:11:11PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 10:29:49AM +0100, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
>> > If we want to disable SBCL builds temporarily we can do something
>> > similar to what I did to disable Rust builds on non-x86_64 architectures
>> > here: 0ed631866cc0b7cece2b0a0b50e39b37ae91bb67.
>> 
>> ------
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/rust.scm b/gnu/packages/rust.scm
>> index 35a96b5754..91b5d6b6ec 100644
>> --- a/gnu/packages/rust.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/rust.scm
>> @@ -452,6 +452,7 @@ test = { path = \"../libtest\" }
>>              (variable "LIBRARY_PATH")
>>              (files '("lib" "lib64")))))
>>  
>> +    (supported-systems '("x86_64-linux"))
>>      (synopsis "Compiler for the Rust programming language")
>>      (description "Rust is a systems programming language that provides 
>> memory
>>  safety and thread safety guarantees.")
>> ------
>> 
>> Hm, this would also prevent users from building the packages on their
>> own machines. We need a way to make changes like this but limit them to
>> the build farm.
>
> Would marking it unsubstitutable work? Or would we need build-local

If you mark it as #:substitutable? #f, then CI won’t try to build it but
users can still build it.

Now, I think we should avoid papering over CI configuration issues (did
I get that right?) by changing package definitions.

HTH!

Ludo’.