[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#45826: SBCL / Common Lisp packages fail to build on aarch64
|
From: |
Leo Famulari |
|
Subject: |
bug#45826: SBCL / Common Lisp packages fail to build on aarch64 |
|
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:17:05 -0500 |
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 02:13:58PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Now, I think we should avoid papering over CI configuration issues (did
> I get that right?) by changing package definitions.
Yes, that's idiomatic English, if that is what you were asking about.
And I agree, the package definitions shouldn't include workarounds for
CI problems.
- bug#45826: SBCL / Common Lisp packages fail to build on aarch64, (continued)
- bug#45826: SBCL / Common Lisp packages fail to build on aarch64, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2021/01/13
- bug#45826: SBCL / Common Lisp packages fail to build on aarch64, Leo Famulari, 2021/01/13
- bug#45826: SBCL / Common Lisp packages fail to build on aarch64, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2021/01/16
- bug#45826: SBCL / Common Lisp packages fail to build on aarch64, Leo Famulari, 2021/01/16
- bug#45826: SBCL / Common Lisp packages fail to build on aarch64, Mathieu Othacehe, 2021/01/17
- bug#45826: SBCL / Common Lisp packages fail to build on aarch64, Christopher Baines, 2021/01/17
- bug#45826: SBCL / Common Lisp packages fail to build on aarch64, Mathieu Othacehe, 2021/01/18
- bug#45826: SBCL / Common Lisp packages fail to build on aarch64, Leo Famulari, 2021/01/17
- bug#45826: SBCL / Common Lisp packages fail to build on aarch64, Efraim Flashner, 2021/01/17
- bug#45826: SBCL / Common Lisp packages fail to build on aarch64, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/01/19
- bug#45826: SBCL / Common Lisp packages fail to build on aarch64,
Leo Famulari <=