[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#53903: aarch64: failed to compute the derivation for Guix
From: |
Christopher Baines |
Subject: |
bug#53903: aarch64: failed to compute the derivation for Guix |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Feb 2022 09:30:14 +0000 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.6.10; emacs 27.2 |
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
> Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> writes:
>
>> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
>>
>> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>>
>>> \ 'check' phaseBacktrace:
>>> 13 (primitive-load
>>> "/gnu/store/l7rhvfaziri0znvs3jc6khrkxaq9shna-compute-guix-derivation")
>>> \ 'check' phaseIn ice-9/eval.scm:
>>> 155:9 12 (_ _)
>>> 159:9 11 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#<directory (guile-u?> ?)
>>> ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?))
>>> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>>> 152:2 10 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
>>> 152:2 9 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
>>> In ./guix/store.scm:
>>> \ 'check' phase 2129:24 8 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.99
>>> ffffa4873190> _ #:guile-for-build _ #:system _ #:target _)
>>> 1966:8 7 (_ _)
>>> - 'check' phaseIn ./guix/gexp.scm:
>>> 296:22 6 (_ _)
>>> \ 'check' phase 1180:2 5 (_ _)
>>> | 'check' phasebuilder for
>>> `/gnu/store/2j5348zpz32qmb7x4v5ipg26d269hgxf-coreutils-8.32.drv' failed
>>> with exit code 1
>>> build of /gnu/store/2j5348zpz32qmb7x4v5ipg26d269hgxf-coreutils-8.32.drv
>>> failed
>>
>> Looks like this derivation can be built at least:
>>
>>
>> https://data.guix.gnu.org/gnu/store/2j5348zpz32qmb7x4v5ipg26d269hgxf-coreutils-8.32.drv
>
> Interesting. I wonder what machine built it; maybe it succeeds in qemu.
> The honeycombs here all cannot “guix pull”, so I suspect that they all
> fail to build it.
Unfortunately, looking up what machine built it requires poking in the
build coordinator database currently. I looked, and it was monokuma (an
Overdrive machine).
>>> View build log at
>>> '/var/log/guix/drvs/2j/5348zpz32qmb7x4v5ipg26d269hgxf-coreutils-8.32.drv.bz2'.
>>
>> Would you be able to share this log, or at least the last bit of it?
>
> There’s one failing test:
>
> ==> foo <==
> + fail=1
> + break
> + Exit 1
> + set +e
> + exit 1
> + exit 1
> + remove_tmp_
> + __st=1
> + cleanup_
> + kill 23895
> + wait 23895
> + test '' = yes
> + cd /tmp/guix-build-coreutils-8.32.drv-0/coreutils-8.32
> + chmod -R u+rwx
> /tmp/guix-build-coreutils-8.32.drv-0/coreutils-8.32/gt-assert.sh.B8Wf
> + rm -rf /tmp/guix-build-coreutils-8.32.drv-0/coreutils-8.32/gt-assert.sh.B8Wf
> + exit 1
> FAIL tests/tail-2/assert.sh (exit status: 1)
I tried building this derivation on the HoneyComb machine hooked up to
bordeaux.guix.gnu.org, and it fails to build in the same way.
Maybe this is a failure that happens (or is more likely) with more
cores. The linux-libre version is slightly different on monokuma as
well, it's running 5.12.17-gnu currently.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- bug#53903: aarch64: failed to compute the derivation for Guix, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/02/09
- bug#53903: aarch64: failed to compute the derivation for Guix, Christopher Baines, 2022/02/09
- bug#53903: aarch64: failed to compute the derivation for Guix, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/02/09
- bug#53903: aarch64: failed to compute the derivation for Guix,
Christopher Baines <=
- bug#53903: aarch64: failed to compute the derivation for Guix, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/02/10
- bug#53903: aarch64: failed to compute the derivation for Guix, Christopher Baines, 2022/02/10
- bug#53903: aarch64: failed to compute the derivation for Guix, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/02/10
- bug#53903: aarch64: failed to compute the derivation for Guix, pukkamustard, 2022/02/11
- bug#53903: aarch64: failed to compute the derivation for Guix, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/02/11
bug#53903: aarch64: failed to compute the derivation for Guix, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/02/09