bug#53903: aarch64: failed to compute the derivation for Guix

[Ricardo Wurmus]

Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> writes:

> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>
>>>>>> View build log at 
>>>>>> '/var/log/guix/drvs/2j/5348zpz32qmb7x4v5ipg26d269hgxf-coreutils-8.32.drv.bz2'.
>>>>>
>>>>> Would you be able to share this log, or at least the last bit of it?
>>>>
>>>> There’s one failing test:
>>>>
>>>> ==> foo <==
>>>> + fail=1
>>>> + break
>>>> + Exit 1
>>>> + set +e
>>>> + exit 1
>>>> + exit 1
>>>> + remove_tmp_
>>>> + __st=1
>>>> + cleanup_
>>>> + kill 23895
>>>> + wait 23895
>>>> + test '' = yes
>>>> + cd /tmp/guix-build-coreutils-8.32.drv-0/coreutils-8.32
>>>> + chmod -R u+rwx 
>>>> /tmp/guix-build-coreutils-8.32.drv-0/coreutils-8.32/gt-assert.sh.B8Wf
>>>> + rm -rf 
>>>> /tmp/guix-build-coreutils-8.32.drv-0/coreutils-8.32/gt-assert.sh.B8Wf
>>>> + exit 1
>>>> FAIL tests/tail-2/assert.sh (exit status: 1)
>>>
>>> I tried building this derivation on the HoneyComb machine hooked up to
>>> bordeaux.guix.gnu.org, and it fails to build in the same way.
>>>
>>> Maybe this is a failure that happens (or is more likely) with more
>>> cores. The linux-libre version is slightly different on monokuma as
>>> well, it's running 5.12.17-gnu currently.
>>
>> Thanks for reproducing this issue!  I wonder what we should do about
>> this; is it a real problem in coreutils, a problem with the test suite,
>> or something else.
>>
>> To get past this we could replace coreutils on aarch64 with a package
>> that disables this test, but before attempting to implement this
>> workaround I’d like to know if there’s a real problem that also needs to
>> be addressed.
>
> I tried building it again on the Overdrive machine, and it succeeded. I
> also tried building it with --cores=1 on the HoneyComb machine and that
> succeeded too.

I have not been able to build this on Kreuzberg (a HoneyComb machine)
with “--cores=1”.  The same test keeps failing.  I tried this at least
five times.

-- 
Ricardo