Re: Usable translators: nsmux details

[olafBuddenhagen]

Hi,

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:05:51PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:31:26AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:

> > And that means: nothing missing, nsmux works as it should? 
> 
> Apparently, nsmux is capable of performing a basic subset of
> functionality it was designed to be capable of doing.  I can remember
> myself trying a number (not a considerable one, though) of tests that
> proved that nsmux starts translators nicely, but I never tried to see
> whether anonymous translators went away on their own.
> 
> You'd better wait until antrik has his final answer to this question,

Not sure what question you mean...

-antrik-