[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: hurdextras in git?

From: olafBuddenhagen
Subject: Re: hurdextras in git?
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 04:19:46 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)


On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 06:38:39PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 03:23:51AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:

> > > > They have some very interesting translators, and these should be
> > > > easily available.
> > 
> > Should all be in one repository with different subfolders or should
> > each have its own repo? 
> It would be kind of nice if you could just download a single repo and
> do a make install to get all (working) translators installed at onced,
> but part of me also want to keep independant translators separate.

IMHO Hurd-Extras was a very bad idea from the start. People writing
useful translators should just man up and assign copyrights, so they can
be included in the main Hurd repository -- where they actually stand a
chance of getting some maintenance and deployment...

> Ideal would be if they would be subrepos that could be easily created
> or removed, but I don't think Savannah supports easy creation of
> repos...

You mean Git submodules? Yeah, that's an option worth considering. I'm a
little undecided on submodules vs. monolithic repo. (I definitely
dislike the idea of completely independant repos.)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]