bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp]


From: Svante Signell
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp]
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 09:17:09 +0100

On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 02:28 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I forgot to comment on the udeb version: I don't think we want to create
> an inetutils-tools udeb package, while we can simply issue settrans
> which should be easy and fine enough, since we only handle one
> interface, thus my changes.

Ok, I'm attaching the patch, fix_ftbfs4hurd.dpatch, with your updated
dhclient-scripts. I think my name should be removed from the patched
scripts, you did most of the changes.

Still missing are dependencies on inetutils-tools (inetutils-ifconfig)
(and maybe inetutils-ping) for GNU/Hurd in the control file:

(if needed, it looks like the Linux package does not depend on
net-tools, containing route and ifconfig or iputils-ping containing
ping?)

Package: isc-dhcp-client
Architecture: any
Depends: debianutils (>= 2.8.2), isc-dhcp-common (= ${binary:Version}),

-iproute [linux-any], ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
(I'm not sure about the syntax here)
+iproute [linux-any]| inetutils-tools [hurd] , ${shlibs:Depends}, 

${misc:Depends}

In order to get a successful configure, the patch in bug #602312 by
Colin Watson have to be applied to configure.ac to cope with the new
behavior of the linker: --no-add-needed since gcc-4.4.5-11. I'm
attaching an updated dhcp-4.1.0-ldap-code.dpatch

Also attached is the dpatch series file: 00list

I just built from source again, and it went well. Hoewever it is not yet
installed again and tested with the updated dhclient-scripts. Comments
on improvements are welcome.

Svante

Attachment: fix_ftbfs4hurd.dpatch
Description: application/shellscript

Attachment: dhcp-4.1.0-ldap-code.dpatch
Description: application/shellscript

Attachment: 00list
Description: Text document


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]