[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
[bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released |
Date: |
Tue, 18 May 2010 21:57:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <address@hidden> writes:
> > If you do the following in a Makefile.am:
> >
> > | ifdef foo
> > | bar = frob
> > | endif
> >
> > You get an error like:
> >
> > | Makefile.am:3: endif without if
>
> I see. You need to use 'if', not 'ifdef', and the symbol needs to be
> declared using AM_CONDITIONAL.
>
> That doesn't explain why though, which is what I'm interested in. The
> `if' construct is automakeism and gets expanded during ./configure,
> whilst ifdef is makeism and is dynamic.
I don't think everything that works in a Makefile necessarily works in a
Makefile.am, and extensions like ifdef could be one such case.
/Simon
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/05/18
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Simon Josefsson, 2010/05/18
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/05/18
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Simon Josefsson, 2010/05/18
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/05/18
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Simon Josefsson, 2010/05/18
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/05/18
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released,
Simon Josefsson <=
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/05/19
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Adam Sampson, 2010/05/19
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/05/18
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/05/18
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/05/19
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Adam Sampson, 2010/05/19