[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released
From: |
Adam Sampson |
Subject: |
[bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released |
Date: |
Tue, 18 May 2010 20:28:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 02:42:31PM -0400, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> That doesn't explain why though, which is what I'm interested in. The
> `if' construct is automakeism and gets expanded during ./configure,
> whilst ifdef is makeism and is dynamic.
Yes, that's why -- automake only knows about "if", not "ifdef", so if it
sees an "endif" without a corresponding "if" it'll assume you forgot
one. There's no provision for passing through GNU-make-specific stuff
like ifdef, which is probably a good thing since it means you can't use
it by accident in a Makefile that you intended to be portable...
--
Adam Sampson <address@hidden> <http://offog.org/>
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/05/18
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Simon Josefsson, 2010/05/18
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/05/18
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Simon Josefsson, 2010/05/18
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/05/18
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Simon Josefsson, 2010/05/18
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/05/18
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Simon Josefsson, 2010/05/18
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/05/19
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released,
Adam Sampson <=
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/05/18
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/05/18
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/05/19
- [bug-inetutils] Re: inetutils-1.8 released, Adam Sampson, 2010/05/19