[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 34 failed
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 34 failed |
Date: |
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 10:11:45 +0100 (CET) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.9a |
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 09:58:38AM +0100, Roberto Bagnara wrote:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> >What I instead meant was: the installed libltdl.la file is missing,
> >but the libltdl.so.7 file is still present, as is the ltdl.h header
> >in the include directory.
> >
> >Does that still match your setup?
>
> The problem is that I have installed 2.2 and then the versions patched
> as you indicated on the same path. So, even if something that belonged
> to 2.1.b was still there when I say 2.2's `make check' failing, now it
> has been overwritten.
OK.
> >Also, are things working for you with 2.3a now?
>
> Things work with 2.2 + your patches. However, I am of course willing to
test with 2.3a. Where is it? I have looked in
There is no release 2.3a. 2.3a is the term for the CVS version, i.e.,
currently CVS HEAD. There will however be a 2.2.2 in a few weeks.
Just to make sure I have understood you right: if with whatever you
currently have, you run
make check-local TESTSUITEFLAGS="-v -d -x -k AC_WITH_LTDL"
then this passes for you now?
Thanks,
Ralf
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 34 failed, (continued)
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 34 failed, Roberto Bagnara, 2008/03/03
- libtool generated by "GNU $PACKAGE" (was: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 34 failed), Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/04
- mode=execute argument munging bug (was: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 34 failed), Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/04
- Re: mode=execute argument munging bug, Roberto Bagnara, 2008/03/05
- Re: mode=execute argument munging bug, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/05
- Re: mode=execute argument munging bug, Roberto Bagnara, 2008/03/07
Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 34 failed, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/06