[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [1.5.26] new test using 'make install DESTDIR=...'

From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: [1.5.26] new test using 'make install DESTDIR=...'
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:36:48 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)

Hello Michael,

* Michael Haubenwallner wrote on Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 05:53:48PM CET:
> as I still encounter problems with libtool-1.5.26 and "make install
> DESTDIR=...", from 'depdemo-inst.test' I've derived a new
> 'depdemo-instd.test', simply installing depdemo via DESTDIR.
> Attached is a patch to add this test for libtool-1.5.26.

Thank you for the patch.  Is there anything keeping you from moving to
Libtool-2.2?  If no, could you be bothered to redo this for 2.2?  If
you don't have time, I can do it but it may be a while.  Note that I
don't have a problem with still adding patches to branch-1-5, but I'm
not sure whether there will be a 1.5.28, and independently of this
question we should ensure HEAD does not have any regressions over

Note also that 2.2 already has a couple of DESTDIR-related tests in
tests/destdir.at.  But more test exposure certainly cannot hurt.

Thanks for your efforts.

> It simply works when using something like the second attached patch to
> fall back to "guess we'll fake it" (like all my other platforms),
> although hardcode_direct IMHO is generally a bad idea when some RUNPATH
> can be encoded, even without using DESTDIR.

We've put some fixes in HEAD for this, notably for AIX and OpenBSD.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]