[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: comments on CVS from 2002-07-14 15:58 (long)
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: comments on CVS from 2002-07-14 15:58 (long) |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Jul 2002 06:50:21 +0200 (CEST) |
> Now I remember. The positioning error is in tex/dvips (they use
> internal rounding because someone assumes a fixed resolution printer)
> If you use -f ps, you'll notice that the endings match up exactly.
OK, thanks for the info.
> > . \clef "bass_8" is ugly. The `8' glyph is too big and should be
> > below the lowest staff line.
>
> does this hold for all clefs?
I think so: both `8' and `15' (either at the top or at the bottom)
should stay outside of the staff since the number is typeset at a very
small size.
Werner
- Re: comments on CVS from 2002-07-14 15:58 (long), (continued)
- Re: comments on CVS from 2002-07-14 15:58 (long), Chris Jackson, 2002/07/16
- Re: comments on CVS from 2002-07-14 15:58 (long), Werner LEMBERG, 2002/07/17
- Re: comments on CVS from 2002-07-14 15:58 (long), Mats Bengtsson, 2002/07/25
- Re: comments on CVS from 2002-07-14 15:58 (long), Werner LEMBERG, 2002/07/26
- Re: comments on CVS from 2002-07-14 15:58 (long), Mats Bengtsson, 2002/07/26
comments on CVS from 2002-07-14 15:58 (long), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/07/15
comments on CVS from 2002-07-14 15:58 (long), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/07/15
- Re: comments on CVS from 2002-07-14 15:58 (long),
Werner LEMBERG <=
Re: comments on CVS from 2002-07-14 15:58 (long), Werner LEMBERG, 2002/07/16