Re: Missing number in broken triplet

[Graham Percival]

Isn't this another case of
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=405&q=tuplet

(although you haven't used #'brackt-visibility here, adding it doens't help)

Cheers,
- Graham

Hans Aberg wrote:
> I report this problem just for completeness. If one breaks up a triple 
> into to two parts, as in the following example, the triplet number on 
> the single note does not show. The code is
> {
>   \time 2/8
>   \times 2/3 { e16 f16 } g8 \times 2/3 { a16 } |
> }
> It looks as in the attached GIF. (There is a beaming problem too, but 
> this has been reported in other bug reports.)
>
> If one makes sure each broken triplet has more than one note, then the 
> triplet numbers do show. E.g.,
> {
>   \time 4/8
>   \times 2/3 { e16 f16 } g8 \times 2/3 { a16 b16 } c8 \times 2/3 { d16 
> e16 } |
> }
>
>   Hans Åberg
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond