[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Status of break-align-symbol vs. break-align-symbols

From: Robin Bannister
Subject: Status of break-align-symbol vs. break-align-symbols
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:49:42 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)


Convert rule 2.11.23 replaces _any_ break-align-symbol and its symbol 
with a break-align-symbols list containing just that symbol.    
This is reported in the NEWS as a syntax change.   

So presumably break-align-symbols is no more than a generalisation
of break-align-symbol, simply catering for more than one symbol.    
But this interpretation does not tally with 

In define-grobs.scm 2.12.2 there are    
 - 11 grobs with break-align-symbol     
 -  2 grobs with break-align-symbols (BarNumber and RehearsalMark)     

This looks out of sync with convert-ly, 
but maybe the break-align code caters for a transitional phase?  

In the following case it doesn't:  
The custos trick in 
was not demonstrated there, but it works.   

The corresponding override currently in the LSR is ineffective.   


(2.11.23 fixed issue 97)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]