bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue 602 in lilypond: Feature request: better support for Sacred Ha


From: lilypond
Subject: Re: Issue 602 in lilypond: Feature request: better support for Sacred Harp notation
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 01:42:00 +0000


Comment #12 on issue 602 by rbstoddard: Feature request: better support for Sacred Harp notation
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=602

And Carl, to address your concern re Aiken, my 1994 edition of The Christian Harmony by William Walker (by Folk Heritage of Western North Carolina, Inc.), which is a high-quality reproduction of the 1873 CH, clearly shows "mi" notes with strong NW/SE diagonals, regardless of stem orientation (see p. 145 top, e.g.). This is the
opposite of SH1991 practice.

Regarding other 4-shape books:

The Cooper edition of the SH clearly has the SW/NE emphasis in the mi notehead, matching the SH1991. (This is true for the original plates; the newly typeset tunes,
however, abolish any differential weight.)

The fifth printing of The Southern Harmony of 1854 (reprinted 1987 by University of Kentucky) shows no discernible weight difference in any limb (see p. v of the Rudiments). Karen Willard's modern font, used in the J.L.White Sacred Harp reprint,
the Christmas Harp, and other volumes, follows this practice.

The Missouri Harmony, 9th Edition (1840), reprinted by University of Nebraska Press in 1994, also shows a NW/SE emphasis. This book has stems for a mi appearing from the upper or lower tip of the notehead, similar to petrucci style (see p.71 top).

So...bottom line? Ambiguous. IMO, some difference in weight adds a visual dynamic to the score that draws the eye along. Given that the two dominant books (Cooper and
SH1991) both use the SW/NE orientation, I think there's little doubt that
/sacredHarpHeads should follow that convention. On the evidence of the CH (NC) edition, though, /aikenHeads should use a NW/SE convention. I'm not a 7-note singer,
though, so my library there is thin.  Anyone else able to offer an insight?

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]