|
From: | lilypond |
Subject: | Re: Issue 1303 in lilypond: Consecutive TrillSpanners may be chained or stacked, depending on the syntax. |
Date: | Sat, 09 Oct 2010 23:02:37 +0000 |
Comment #5 on issue 1303 by v.villenave: Consecutive TrillSpanners may be chained or stacked, depending on the syntax.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1303Actually, I did overlook the ledger-lines inconsistency. You're quite right, it *is* indeed a Defect (not sure about the Low priority though).
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |