Re: Issue 1303 in lilypond: Consecutive TrillSpanners may be chained or stacked, depending on the syntax.

[lilypond]

Updates:
        Status: Duplicate
        Mergedinto: 923

Comment #6 on issue 1303 by n.puttock: Consecutive TrillSpanners may be  
chained or stacked, depending on the syntax.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1303

This is a duplicate of issue 923.

The notes without legers are slightly further to the right, which means the  
stencil calculation for TrillSpanner can add an extra squiggle (thus  
triggering outside-staff avoidance.)