Re: Bug in 64th-note sloped beams

[address@hidden]

On Apr 27, 2011, at 11:31 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:

> "James Lowe" <address@hidden> wrote in message news:address@hidden
>> Fwding to email group as I was sent this privately:
>> 
>> )-----Original Message-----
>> )From: Bird [mailto:address@hidden
>> )Sent: 27 April 2011 10:00
>> )To: James Lowe
>> )Subject: RE: Bug in 64th-note sloped beams
>> )
>> )> Hello,
>> )
>> )> % Accidentals inside a sloped 64th-note beam % cause an error in
>> )> version 2.13.60.
>> )>
>> )> \version "2.13.60"
>> )> \relative c'' { c64[ des] }
>> )>
>> )> Can you define 'error'?
>> )>
>> )> James
>> )
>> 
>> Running on Mac OS X x86, this input generates the message
>> "programming error: No viable beam quanting found.  Using unquanted y
>> value." The output looks like
>> 
>> http://img845.imageshack.us/i/lilypond21360error.png/
>> 
>> I can get a similar error with 16th notes further apart:
>> 
>> \relative c'' { g16[ fis'] }
>> 
>> The same thing happens with autobeaming but it makes the example
>> longer. The problem is new since 2.13.53 and I haven't found anything
>> covering this single-staff, single- voice beaming problem in the bug
>> 
>> reports.
> 
> I am currently assuming that beaming problems are caused by 
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1619
> 

This problem isn't in version 2.13.61.

Cheers,
MS